Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Walia, Paramjeet Kaur
- Use of Social Media Technologies (SMTs) by Faculty Members, Research Scholars and Post-Graduate Students of Management Studies
Abstract Views :274 |
PDF Views:18
Authors
Affiliations
1 Central Library, University College of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, Delhi - 110095, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi - 110007, IN
1 Central Library, University College of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, Delhi - 110095, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Delhi, Delhi - 110007, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 54, No 4 (2017), Pagination: 204-210Abstract
The Social Media Technologies (SMTs) offer facilities for information dissemination this paper aims to assess the awareness and use of SMTs by faculty members, research scholars and post-graduate students of management studies. A survey was carried out in ten management institutions located in the National Capital Region (NCR) of Delhi. The findings revealed that respondents in the field of management studies are quite aware of SMTs and prefer to use YouTube, Wikis and Blogs for their work related purposes. Podcast and Micro-blogging are less used tools.
Keywords
Blogs, Management Studies, Social Media Technologies (SMTs), Social Networking Sites, Web 2.0, RSS.References
- Kaplan A.M. and Haenlein M. (2010). Users of the world unite! The challenge and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1):59−68. Accessed on 22 Feb 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
- Whiting Anita and Williams David. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4):362 – 69. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041.
- Alexander B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new way of innovation for teaching and learning. Educause Review, 41(2):32−44. Accessed on 8 Aug 2013. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0621.pdf.
- Mutula Stephen M. and Wamukoya Justus M. (2007). Web information management: a cross-disciplinary textbook. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781780631899.
- Ajjan Haya and Hartshorne Richard. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education,11.2:71−80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002.
- Boulos Maged N Kamel; Maramba Inocencio and Wheeler Steve. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: A new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education, 6(41):6−41. Accessed on 26 Feb. 2015. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-6-41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-41.
- Nicholas David and Rowlands Ian (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Information Services and Use, 31:61–83. Accessed on 13 July 2013 http://www.uib.no/sites/w3.uib.no/files/attachments/nicholas_rowlands_socialmedia_research-workflow_2011.pdf.
- Gaffar Kemuel; Singh Lenandlar and Thomas Troy. (2011). Are we ready for Web 2.0? Evidence from a caribbean university. Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 1(2):129–46. Accessed on 22 Feb. 2015 http://libraries.sta.uwi.edu/journals/ojs/index.php/cts/article/view/13.
- Tenopir Carol Rachel and King Volentine Donald W. (2013). Social media and scholarly reading. Online Information Review, 37(2):193–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2012-0062.
- Madhusudhan Margam (2012). Use of social networking sites by research scholars of the University of Delhi: A study. International Information and Library Review, 44(2):100−13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2012.1076 2919, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iilr.2012.04.006.
- Nandez Gemma and Borrego Ángel (2013). Use of social networks for academic purposes: A case study. The Electronic Library, 31(6):781–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-03-2012-0031.
- Nigam Karnika and Singh M.P. (2016). Impact of social networking sites in scholarly communication by state universities of Uttrakhand. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 36(5):291−301. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.36.5.10085.
- Authorship Pattern in Library and Information Science Journal Literature
Abstract Views :220 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and information Science, University of Delhi, Deihi- 110007, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science. University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, IN
1 Department of Library and information Science, University of Delhi, Deihi- 110007, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science. University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, IN
Source
Information Studies, Vol 18, No 3 (2012), Pagination: 163-176Abstract
The purpose of this study is to mai<e a comparative analysis of authorship trends in USA, UK and hidia. In the field of Library and Information Science (LIS). Nine LIS journals were selected for this study. These details include gender, occupation, affiliation, geographic location and coauthorship. The nine journals selected for this study are published from USA, UK and India. A total of 269 articles by 471 authors were analysed.. In spite of the fact that librarianship is perceived to be female-dominated, a larger number of articles were contributed by male authors except in the case of USA... LIS faculty contributed more articles (c.41%) in comparison to practising librarians, research scholars etc. collaborative papers are predominant in all the journals studied. LIS journals published from UK received more papers from other countries in comparison to journals published from USA and India.Keywords
Authorship Pattern, LIS Journal Literature, LIS Research.References
- Saracevic, Tefko and Perk, Lawrence J. (1973). Ascertaining activities in a subject area through bibliometric analysis: Application to library literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 24(2); p. 120-134.
- Olsgaard, John N. and Olsgaard, Jane Kinch. (1980). Authorship in Five Library Periodicals. College and Research Libraries. 41(1); p.49-53.
- Raptis, Paschalis. (1992). Authorship Characteristics in Five International Library Science Journals. Libri. 42(1); p.35-52.
- Bottle, R.T. and Efthimiadis, E.N. (1984). Library and Information Science Literature: Authorship and Growth Patterns. Journal of Information Science. 9(3); p. 107-116.
- Watson, Paula D. (1985). Production of Scholarly Articles by Academic Librarians and Library School Faculty. College and Research Libraries. 46(4); p.334-342.
- Swigger, Keith. (1985-86). Institutional Affiliations of Authors of Research Articles. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 26(2); p. 105-110.
- Krausse, Sylvia C, and Sieburth, Janice F. (1985). Patterns of Authorship in Library Journals by Academic Librarians. The Serials Librarian. 9(3); p. 127-138.
- Buttlar, Lois. (1991). Analyzing the Library Periodical Literature: Content and Authorship. College and Research Libraries. 52(1); p.38-53.
- Enger, Kathy B. et al. (1989). Statistical Methods Used by Authors of Library and Information Science Journal Articles. Library and Information Science Research. 11(1); p.37-46.
- Kumar, Surendra and Kumar S. (2008). Citation Analysis of Journals of Oilseeds Research 1993-2004. Annals of Library and Information Studies. 55(1); p.35-44.